3 km/L to mpg (US) — 3 kilometres per litre in US miles per gallon

3km/L7.056438mpg (US)

3 km/L → 7.056438 mpg (US)

3 kilometres per litre in other units

Litres per 100 km33.333333L/100 km
US miles per gallon7.056438mpg (US)
Imperial miles per gallon8.474428mpg (UK)
Miles per litre1.864114mi/L

km/L to mpg (US) at a glance

Kilometres per litreUS miles per gallon
1 km/L2.352146 mpg (US)
2 km/L4.704292 mpg (US)
3 km/L7.056438 mpg (US)
5 km/L11.760729 mpg (US)
10 km/L23.521458 mpg (US)
20 km/L47.042917 mpg (US)
25 km/L58.803646 mpg (US)
50 km/L117.607292 mpg (US)
100 km/L235.214583 mpg (US)
250 km/L588.036458 mpg (US)
500 km/L1,176.07 mpg (US)
1,000 km/L2,352.15 mpg (US)

How to convert kilometres per litre to US miles per gallon

Multiply by 2.352146 — one kilometre per litre is 2.352146 US miles per gallon.

Working 3 km/L → 7.056438 mpg (US)

In words: about seven US miles per gallon.

What these units are

The kilometre per litre and the US mile per gallon are covered in the fuel economy unit guide, along with every other unit on this page.

Questions

How many US miles per gallon are in a kilometre per litre?

One kilometre per litre is 2.352146 US miles per gallon.

What is 3 kilometres per litre in US miles per gallon?

3 kilometres per litre is 7.056438 US miles per gallon. The working is 3 km/L → 7.056438 mpg (US).

Why can't I convert mpg with a simple multiplier?

Because the two measures run in opposite directions. Miles per gallon counts distance per unit of fuel; litres per 100 km counts fuel per unit of distance. One is the reciprocal of the other, so you divide rather than multiply.

Why is UK mpg always a bigger number than US mpg?

The Imperial gallon is about 20% larger, so the same car travels further on one of them. A car rated 30 mpg in the US is around 36 mpg in the UK, with nothing about the car having changed.

Going from 15 to 20 mpg, or 30 to 40 mpg — which saves more fuel?

The first, by a wide margin. Over 10,000 miles the 15-to-20 change saves about 167 gallons; the 30-to-40 change saves about 83. This is exactly the trap the inverse relationship sets, and why litres per 100 km is the easier measure to reason with.

Other fuel economy conversions

More conversions